If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
Wow! I just finished watching a video at StomperNet about Hello.txt by Paul Colligan. What a time saver! If you belong to as many social sites as I do, it totally rocks.
You can post your snippets to Twitter, Pownce, MySpace, Facebook, LinkdIn, Plaxo, and a host of other social sites all at the same time.
So, for example, I’m going to post to these sites about this blog post so that folks can check it out.
In the olden days… like, um, yesterday… I had to tweet at Twitter, then go to Facebook and post there, then go to Pownce, etc. Now, I can just go to Hello.txt and have it posted at all my favorite social sites all at the same time.
Love it!
Web 2.0 is really cool, and a whole lot of fun. I feel that the Web is leaning toward these sites that people want in a very big way. So, how will this affect search?
I’m thinking a LOT. Look at Google. What can you type into the search bar that doesn’t come back with Wikipedia in the first position? Well, I know there are keywords that don’t, but you know what I mean. Wikipedia gets a huge nod from Google, and nothing says that everything IN Wikipedia is 100% fact. I mean, kids are basing term papers on that kind of research, and it kind of scares me because it’s very dangerous to the truth.
No doubt, a big portion of Wikipedia is good, solid information, but as a very experienced researcher, it just isn’t a solid source. I’d never base anything on Wikipedia. I might use it as a quick idea starter, so that I can go to a respected source and get more information, but anyway, my point is, Wikipedia is at the top of Google because people love it. It gets lots of “votes” from people linking to it, good or not-so-factual.
So, what will happen? Do you think that the people-driven sites will take the place of Google? Will we actually be saying, “Hey, Google or whomever, we search in these social sites for news and information instead of yours because we know that other people think highly of them,”? And nothing’s better than good old word-of-mouth recommendation, eh?
I see social sites taking over in a big way, and I’m totally enjoying it, but remember, it just ain’t gospel.
Pass it on.
Popularity: 34% [?]
July 8th, 2008 at 5:25 pm
Hellotxt and a Move to the Social?…
Hellotxt.com totally rules, if you’re a social butterfly. But if you are, how do you think that this move to the social will affect search? Are we leaning more toward the people-driven and away from the spider-driven?…
July 9th, 2008 at 5:21 pm
Most schools do not take wikipedia or google as sources. As a High School English teacher, I remind them that I am capable of pulling wikipedia up and noting on their papers where it matches the google article .. and to be honest — I do it because I think they should think for themselves and actually put a little thought into there work.
I do love social sights though I think its really cool and interactive — but I agree that its not always entirely factual.
July 9th, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Hi,
i would like to see the StomperNet video about HelloTxt. Where can i found it?
thank you
Fabrizio
July 9th, 2008 at 7:04 pm
Hi Fabrizio,
You have to be a member of StomperNet, and the membership is closed right now. Keep an eye open for when they open memberships again. I can tell you absolutely, postitively, it’s the most comprehensive site online today. Love it!
Pat
July 14th, 2008 at 2:52 am
That’s pretty cool, because when I discovered facebook my myspace became one of my least favorite things in this world. Unfortunately many of my friends still prefer it, so this would allow me to appease them and not make myself miserable. Thanks!